A0Q7C4
multicom
A0Q7C4
full_length
A0Q7C4
Results of Structure Prediction for Target Name: A0Q7C4 ( Click 
)
Domain Boundary prediction ( View )
>A0Q7C4: 1-182
| 1-60: |
M | G | K | V | I | D | L | D | E | I | D | R | L | E | R | E | E | E | N | S | Y | Y | K | T | V | K | S | K | T | S | V | K | K | D | A | L | E | I | T | D | F | G | R | S | L | T | E | L | S | K | E | Q | L | E | K | I | P | I | D | D |
| 61-119: |
N | L | K | N | N | I | I | T | A | K | S | L | H | K | I | A | L | K | R | Q | T | Q | F | I | G | K | L | L | R | K | T | D | N | L | D | E | I | Y | K | A | Y | D | V | L | V | N | K | D | K | Q | A | N | L | M | F | Q | R | L | E | N |
| 121-179: |
I | R | N | N | L | L | D | P | L | K | M | N | N | T | L | D | K | L | I | Q | E | F | P | D | L | D | I | Q | K | L | R | Q | L | I | R | N | H | H | K | E | V | E | K | N | T | T | N | K | S | F | R | E | I | F | K | L | L | R | G | L |
| 181-182: |
Y | V |
| 1-60: |
C | C | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | H |
| 61-119: |
H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
| 121-179: |
H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | H | H | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
| 181-182: |
C | C |
|
| | H(Helix): 131(71.98%) | E(Strand): 3(1.65%) | C(Coil): 48(26.37%) |
| 1-60: |
E | B | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | E | B | E | E |
| 61-119: |
E | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E |
| 121-179: |
B | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | B |
| 181-182: |
E | E |
|
| | e(Exposed): 119(65.38%) | b(Buried): 63(34.62%) |
| 1-60: |
T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 61-119: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 121-179: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 181-182: |
T | N |
|
| | N(Normal): 158(86.81%) | T(Disorder): 24(13.19%) |
Predicted contact map and distance map
|
Predicted distance map
|
|
Predicted contact map
|
Probability to Precision
| Long-Range |
Average probability |
Predicted precision |
| TopL/5 |
0.89 |
88.20 |
| TopL/2 |
0.68 |
71.76 |
Note: The linear model (Average probability vs Predicted precision) was trained on CASP14 dataset
|
Predicted Top 1 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
84.62 |
| TopL |
46.15 |
| Top2L |
23.90 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
3846 |
| Neff |
626 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 2 |
0.8392 |
| Model 3 |
0.7997 |
| Model 4 |
0.8341 |
| Model 5 |
0.7972 |
| Average |
0.81755 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 2p0t |
0.60630 |
| 1gkj |
0.54073 |
| 1b8f |
0.53839 |
| 1eb4 |
0.53744 |
| 1gk2 |
0.53712 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 2 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
83.52 |
| TopL |
44.51 |
| Top2L |
23.35 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
3846 |
| Neff |
626 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.8392 |
| Model 3 |
0.8281 |
| Model 4 |
0.8729 |
| Model 5 |
0.8622 |
| Average |
0.85060 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 2p0t |
0.66885 |
| 6at7 |
0.55426 |
| 6f6t |
0.55078 |
| 1gkj |
0.54933 |
| 1gk3 |
0.54641 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 3 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
81.32 |
| TopL |
43.41 |
| Top2L |
22.80 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
3846 |
| Neff |
626 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.7997 |
| Model 2 |
0.8281 |
| Model 4 |
0.7931 |
| Model 5 |
0.7398 |
| Average |
0.79018 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 2p0t |
0.65879 |
| 3kdz |
0.53487 |
| 5ltm |
0.53394 |
| 2rjr |
0.53341 |
| 2qve |
0.53268 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 4 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
84.62 |
| TopL |
45.05 |
| Top2L |
23.35 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
3846 |
| Neff |
626 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.8341 |
| Model 2 |
0.8729 |
| Model 3 |
0.7931 |
| Model 5 |
0.8931 |
| Average |
0.84830 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 2p0t |
0.63297 |
| 1gk2 |
0.54827 |
| 1b8f |
0.54768 |
| 1eb4 |
0.54675 |
| 1gk3 |
0.54614 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 5 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
79.12 |
| TopL |
42.86 |
| Top2L |
21.98 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
3846 |
| Neff |
626 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.7972 |
| Model 2 |
0.8622 |
| Model 3 |
0.7398 |
| Model 4 |
0.8931 |
| Average |
0.82308 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 2p0t |
0.61887 |
| 1gk2 |
0.58173 |
| 1eb4 |
0.57789 |
| 1gk3 |
0.57788 |
| 1b8f |
0.57725 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
References
[1] Hou, J., Wu, T., Cao, R., & Cheng, J. (2019). Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13. bioRxiv, 552422.
[2] Li, J., Deng, X., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2013). Designing and benchmarking the MULTICOM protein structure prediction system. BMC structural biology, 13(1), 2.
[3] Cheng, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Deng, X. (2012). The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics, 13(1), 65.
[4] Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2010). MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics, 26(7), 882-888.
