B2RHM7
multicom
B2RHM7
full_length
B2RHM7
Results of Structure Prediction for Target Name: B2RHM7 ( Click
)
Domain Boundary prediction ( View
)
>B2RHM7: 1-152
1-60: |
M | I | D | R | E | Q | I | V | R | I | V | S | D | Y | L | S | T | G | E | T | F | L | V | E | V | A | I | H | P | G | N | R | I | L | V | E | L | D | S | A | Q | G | V | C | I | D | E | C | V | A | L | S | R | H | I | E | S | Q | V | D |
61-119: |
R | D | L | E | D | Y | E | L | E | V | G | S | T | G | L | T | S | P | L | K | V | M | R | Q | W | E | N | C | I | D | S | E | L | S | V | L | L | T | N | G | M | K | E | T | G | R | L | I | T | V | A | P | E | A | I | K | L | E | V | V |
121-152: |
R | M | V | K | P | E | G | A | K | R | K | K | P | E | T | Q | E | L | T | I | V | M | A | D | I | K | Q | A | V | R | I | I |
1-60: |
C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | E | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C |
61-119: |
C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E |
121-152: |
E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | H | H | H | H | H | E | E | E | E | E | C |
|
| H(Helix): 40(26.32%) | E(Strand): 60(39.47%) | C(Coil): 52(34.21%) |
1-60: |
E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | E | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | E |
61-119: |
E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | B | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | B | E |
121-152: |
E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | E | B | E | E |
|
| e(Exposed): 100(65.79%) | b(Buried): 52(34.21%) |
1-60: |
T | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
61-119: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
121-152: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
|
| N(Normal): 151(99.34%) | T(Disorder): 1(0.66%) |
Predicted contact map and distance map
Predicted distance map
|
|
Predicted contact map
|
Probability to Precision
Long-Range |
Average probability |
Predicted precision |
TopL/5 |
0.98 |
97.19 |
TopL/2 |
0.91 |
95.29 |
Note: The linear model (Average probability vs Predicted precision) was trained on CASP14 dataset
|
Predicted Top 1 Tertiary structure
|
|
Long-Range |
Precision |
TopL/5 |
96.67 |
TopL/2 |
96.05 |
TopL |
74.34 |
Top2L |
41.78 |
Alignment |
Number |
N |
5677 |
Neff |
1695 |
|
Model comparsion
Model |
TM-score |
Model 2 |
0.9867 |
Model 3 |
0.9799 |
Model 4 |
0.9828 |
Model 5 |
0.9794 |
Average |
0.98220 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
PDB |
TM-score |
5gl6 |
0.57418 |
5iv7 |
0.53716 |
4v55 |
0.53165 |
4v54 |
0.53097 |
4v53 |
0.52875 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 2 Tertiary structure
|
|
Long-Range |
Precision |
TopL/5 |
96.67 |
TopL/2 |
96.05 |
TopL |
73.68 |
Top2L |
41.12 |
Alignment |
Number |
N |
5677 |
Neff |
1695 |
|
Model comparsion
Model |
TM-score |
Model 1 |
0.9867 |
Model 3 |
0.9790 |
Model 4 |
0.9809 |
Model 5 |
0.9864 |
Average |
0.98325 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
PDB |
TM-score |
5gl6 |
0.57481 |
5iv5 |
0.53835 |
5iv7 |
0.53071 |
5yim |
0.52906 |
4v55 |
0.52863 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 3 Tertiary structure
|
|
Long-Range |
Precision |
TopL/5 |
96.67 |
TopL/2 |
96.05 |
TopL |
74.34 |
Top2L |
41.45 |
Alignment |
Number |
N |
5677 |
Neff |
1695 |
|
Model comparsion
Model |
TM-score |
Model 1 |
0.9799 |
Model 2 |
0.9790 |
Model 4 |
0.9847 |
Model 5 |
0.9831 |
Average |
0.98167 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
PDB |
TM-score |
5gl6 |
0.57638 |
5iv7 |
0.53549 |
4v55 |
0.52899 |
4v54 |
0.52829 |
4v53 |
0.52620 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 4 Tertiary structure
|
|
Long-Range |
Precision |
TopL/5 |
96.67 |
TopL/2 |
94.74 |
TopL |
76.32 |
Top2L |
42.76 |
Alignment |
Number |
N |
5677 |
Neff |
1695 |
|
Model comparsion
Model |
TM-score |
Model 1 |
0.9828 |
Model 2 |
0.9809 |
Model 3 |
0.9847 |
Model 5 |
0.9834 |
Average |
0.98295 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
PDB |
TM-score |
5gl6 |
0.57705 |
5iv7 |
0.53101 |
5zq6 |
0.52921 |
4v55 |
0.52869 |
4v54 |
0.52861 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 5 Tertiary structure
|
|
Long-Range |
Precision |
TopL/5 |
100.00 |
TopL/2 |
97.37 |
TopL |
74.34 |
Top2L |
41.12 |
Alignment |
Number |
N |
5677 |
Neff |
1695 |
|
Model comparsion
Model |
TM-score |
Model 1 |
0.9794 |
Model 2 |
0.9864 |
Model 3 |
0.9831 |
Model 4 |
0.9834 |
Average |
0.98308 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
PDB |
TM-score |
5gl6 |
0.57350 |
5iv7 |
0.53552 |
4v55 |
0.52794 |
6b7o |
0.52785 |
6b7m |
0.52716 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
References
[1] Hou, J., Wu, T., Cao, R., & Cheng, J. (2019). Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13. bioRxiv, 552422.
[2] Li, J., Deng, X., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2013). Designing and benchmarking the MULTICOM protein structure prediction system. BMC structural biology, 13(1), 2.
[3] Cheng, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Deng, X. (2012). The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics, 13(1), 65.
[4] Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2010). MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics, 26(7), 882-888.