B2RII7
multicom
B2RII7
full_length
B2RII7
Results of Structure Prediction for Target Name: B2RII7 ( Click 
)
Domain Boundary prediction ( View )
>B2RII7: 1-182
| 1-60: |
M | T | T | A | K | P | N | T | V | E | Q | F | E | H | V | I | D | I | C | R | E | V | F | Q | K | K | L | H | D | Y | G | A | S | W | R | V | M | R | P | S | S | L | T | D | Q | L | Y | I | K | A | N | R | I | R | N | I | Q | M | K | G |
| 61-119: |
L | S | K | V | D | E | G | V | E | S | E | F | I | G | V | V | N | Y | G | V | I | A | L | I | Q | L | E | L | G | V | A | D | T | P | K | M | E | T | E | E | A | L | R | L | Y | D | L | K | I | R | E | A | M | S | L | M | L | D | K | N |
| 121-179: |
H | D | Y | G | E | A | W | R | Q | M | R | V | S | S | F | A | D | L | I | L | T | K | V | F | R | T | K | E | I | E | D | L | G | G | D | T | Y | I | S | E | G | V | D | A | N | Y | M | D | M | I | N | Y | A | I | F | A | L | I | Q | L |
| 181-182: |
N | G |
| 1-60: |
C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C |
| 61-119: |
C | C | E | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C |
| 121-179: |
C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | H | H | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C |
| 181-182: |
C | C |
|
| | H(Helix): 124(68.13%) | E(Strand): 5(2.75%) | C(Coil): 53(29.12%) |
| 1-60: |
E | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | E |
| 61-119: |
B | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | E | E |
| 121-179: |
E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B |
| 181-182: |
E | E |
|
| | e(Exposed): 92(50.55%) | b(Buried): 90(49.45%) |
| 1-60: |
T | T | T | T | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 61-119: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 121-179: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 181-182: |
N | N |
|
| | N(Normal): 178(97.8%) | T(Disorder): 4(2.2%) |
Predicted contact map and distance map
|
Predicted distance map
|
|
Predicted contact map
|
Probability to Precision
| Long-Range |
Average probability |
Predicted precision |
| TopL/5 |
0.96 |
95.04 |
| TopL/2 |
0.87 |
90.60 |
Note: The linear model (Average probability vs Predicted precision) was trained on CASP14 dataset
|
Predicted Top 1 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
100.00 |
| TopL |
73.63 |
| Top2L |
39.56 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1735 |
| Neff |
97 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 2 |
0.9567 |
| Model 3 |
0.9566 |
| Model 4 |
0.9526 |
| Model 5 |
0.9493 |
| Average |
0.95380 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 5myd |
0.56394 |
| 5myf |
0.56279 |
| 5myi |
0.56008 |
| 4olh |
0.55404 |
| 4pxs |
0.55350 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 2 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
100.00 |
| TopL |
73.63 |
| Top2L |
39.56 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1735 |
| Neff |
97 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9567 |
| Model 3 |
0.9769 |
| Model 4 |
0.9784 |
| Model 5 |
0.9807 |
| Average |
0.97318 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 5myd |
0.56564 |
| 5myf |
0.56376 |
| 5myi |
0.56206 |
| 1w2y |
0.54948 |
| 2cic |
0.54333 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 3 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
100.00 |
| TopL |
71.98 |
| Top2L |
39.29 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1735 |
| Neff |
97 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9566 |
| Model 2 |
0.9769 |
| Model 4 |
0.9711 |
| Model 5 |
0.9675 |
| Average |
0.96802 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 5myd |
0.56252 |
| 5myf |
0.56168 |
| 5myi |
0.56058 |
| 1w2y |
0.54858 |
| 4px2 |
0.54673 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 4 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
100.00 |
| TopL |
73.63 |
| Top2L |
40.66 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1735 |
| Neff |
97 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9526 |
| Model 2 |
0.9784 |
| Model 3 |
0.9711 |
| Model 5 |
0.9716 |
| Average |
0.96842 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 5myd |
0.56706 |
| 5myf |
0.56514 |
| 5myi |
0.56348 |
| 1w2y |
0.54744 |
| 2cic |
0.54276 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 5 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
100.00 |
| TopL |
73.08 |
| Top2L |
39.56 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1735 |
| Neff |
97 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9493 |
| Model 2 |
0.9807 |
| Model 3 |
0.9675 |
| Model 4 |
0.9716 |
| Average |
0.96727 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 5myd |
0.56411 |
| 5myf |
0.56249 |
| 5myi |
0.56030 |
| 1w2y |
0.54594 |
| 4px2 |
0.54335 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
References
[1] Hou, J., Wu, T., Cao, R., & Cheng, J. (2019). Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13. bioRxiv, 552422.
[2] Li, J., Deng, X., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2013). Designing and benchmarking the MULTICOM protein structure prediction system. BMC structural biology, 13(1), 2.
[3] Cheng, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Deng, X. (2012). The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics, 13(1), 65.
[4] Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2010). MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics, 26(7), 882-888.
