B2RKI2
multicom
B2RKI2
full_length
B2RKI2
Results of Structure Prediction for Target Name: B2RKI2 ( Click
)
Domain Boundary prediction ( View
)
>B2RKI2: 1-103
| 1-60: |
M | E | N | E | S | K | T | I | N | I | E | L | P | E | E | I | A | Q | G | N | Y | C | N | L | C | I | V | M | H | S | P | S | E | F | V | L | D | F | I | R | M | V | P | N | R | D | T | A | R | V | Q | N | R | I | I | L | T | P | D | N |
| 61-103: |
A | K | R | L | L | T | T | L | S | D | N | I | H | R | Y | E | V | E | H | G | E | I | H | T | E | Q | R | V | S | D | A | T | F | T | F | P | T | K | I | K | G | E | A |
| 1-60: |
C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | H | H | H | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | H | H | H |
| 61-103: |
H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
|
| | H(Helix): 28(27.18%) | E(Strand): 28(27.18%) | C(Coil): 47(45.63%) |
| 1-60: |
E | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | B | E | E | E | B | B | E | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | B |
| 61-103: |
B | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | E |
|
| | e(Exposed): 53(51.46%) | b(Buried): 50(48.54%) |
| 1-60: |
T | T | T | T | T | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 61-103: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T |
|
| | N(Normal): 80(77.67%) | T(Disorder): 23(22.33%) |
Predicted contact map and distance map
|
Predicted distance map
|
|
Predicted contact map
|
Probability to Precision
| Long-Range |
Average probability |
Predicted precision |
| TopL/5 |
0.60 |
60.95 |
| TopL/2 |
0.45 |
47.78 |
Note: The linear model (Average probability vs Predicted precision) was trained on CASP14 dataset
|
Predicted Top 1 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
80.95 |
| TopL/2 |
65.38 |
| TopL |
44.66 |
| Top2L |
24.76 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1905 |
| Neff |
405 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 2 |
0.7597 |
| Model 3 |
0.7561 |
| Model 4 |
0.7360 |
| Model 5 |
0.7454 |
| Average |
0.74930 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 1v04 |
0.52798 |
| 6h0a |
0.52796 |
| 6g82 |
0.52777 |
| 4q1u |
0.52765 |
| 6gmu |
0.52749 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 2 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
80.95 |
| TopL/2 |
63.46 |
| TopL |
44.66 |
| Top2L |
24.76 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1905 |
| Neff |
405 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.7597 |
| Model 3 |
0.8596 |
| Model 4 |
0.7743 |
| Model 5 |
0.8678 |
| Average |
0.81535 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 1h12 |
0.53420 |
| 1h13 |
0.53313 |
| 1h14 |
0.53309 |
| 1v04 |
0.53278 |
| 1xw2 |
0.53267 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 3 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
76.19 |
| TopL/2 |
61.54 |
| TopL |
42.72 |
| Top2L |
24.27 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1905 |
| Neff |
405 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.7561 |
| Model 2 |
0.8596 |
| Model 4 |
0.7506 |
| Model 5 |
0.8745 |
| Average |
0.81020 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 5nis |
0.53063 |
| 5m4a |
0.52852 |
| 3qg0 |
0.52849 |
| 3rsy |
0.52763 |
| 5afx |
0.52131 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 4 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
80.95 |
| TopL/2 |
63.46 |
| TopL |
42.72 |
| Top2L |
23.79 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1905 |
| Neff |
405 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.7360 |
| Model 2 |
0.7743 |
| Model 3 |
0.7506 |
| Model 5 |
0.8118 |
| Average |
0.76817 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 2wm9 |
0.53853 |
| 6tm1 |
0.53597 |
| 3b13 |
0.53291 |
| 6tky |
0.53145 |
| 2wmn |
0.53018 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 5 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
76.19 |
| TopL/2 |
61.54 |
| TopL |
42.72 |
| Top2L |
24.27 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1905 |
| Neff |
405 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.7454 |
| Model 2 |
0.8678 |
| Model 3 |
0.8745 |
| Model 4 |
0.8118 |
| Average |
0.82488 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 6ggy |
0.53953 |
| 2jg0 |
0.51869 |
| 3rrs |
0.51621 |
| 1ubx |
0.51574 |
| 3icz |
0.51512 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
References
[1] Hou, J., Wu, T., Cao, R., & Cheng, J. (2019). Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13. bioRxiv, 552422.
[2] Li, J., Deng, X., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2013). Designing and benchmarking the MULTICOM protein structure prediction system. BMC structural biology, 13(1), 2.
[3] Cheng, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Deng, X. (2012). The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics, 13(1), 65.
[4] Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2010). MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics, 26(7), 882-888.