P71624
multicom
P71624
full_length
P71624
Results of Structure Prediction for Target Name: P71624 ( Click 
)
Domain Boundary prediction ( View )
>P71624: 1-181
| 1-60: |
M | T | P | A | L | K | E | W | S | A | A | V | H | A | L | L | D | G | R | Q | T | V | L | L | R | K | G | G | I | G | E | K | R | F | E | V | A | A | H | E | F | L | L | F | P | T | V | A | H | S | H | A | E | R | V | R | P | E | H | R |
| 61-119: |
D | L | L | G | P | A | A | A | D | S | T | D | E | C | V | L | L | R | A | A | A | K | V | V | A | A | L | P | V | N | R | P | E | G | L | D | A | I | E | D | L | H | I | W | T | A | E | S | V | R | A | D | R | L | D | F | R | P | K | H |
| 121-179: |
R | L | A | V | L | V | V | S | A | I | P | L | A | E | P | V | R | L | A | R | T | P | E | Y | G | G | C | T | S | W | V | Q | L | P | V | T | P | T | L | A | A | P | V | H | D | E | A | A | L | A | E | V | A | A | R | V | R | E | A | V |
| 181-181: |
G |
| 1-60: |
C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | H | H | C | C | C | H | H | H | C | C | H | H | H | H |
| 61-119: |
H | H | H | C | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | E | E | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C |
| 121-179: |
C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C |
| 181-181: |
C |
|
| | H(Helix): 58(32.04%) | E(Strand): 45(24.86%) | C(Coil): 78(43.09%) |
| 1-60: |
E | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | E |
| 61-119: |
E | E | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | B | B | B | E | B | B | E | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | E | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | E |
| 121-179: |
E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | B | E | B | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | E | B | B | B | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | B |
| 181-181: |
E |
|
| | e(Exposed): 97(53.59%) | b(Buried): 84(46.41%) |
| 1-60: |
T | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 61-119: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 121-179: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 181-181: |
N |
|
| | N(Normal): 180(99.45%) | T(Disorder): 1(0.55%) |
Predicted contact map and distance map
|
Predicted distance map
|
|
Predicted contact map
|
Probability to Precision
| Long-Range |
Average probability |
Predicted precision |
| TopL/5 |
0.98 |
97.60 |
| TopL/2 |
0.94 |
98.47 |
Note: The linear model (Average probability vs Predicted precision) was trained on CASP14 dataset
|
Predicted Top 1 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
96.70 |
| TopL |
92.27 |
| Top2L |
74.03 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1745 |
| Neff |
451 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 2 |
0.9813 |
| Model 3 |
0.8932 |
| Model 4 |
0.9864 |
| Model 5 |
0.9836 |
| Average |
0.96113 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 5y7d |
0.56709 |
| 5y6b |
0.54801 |
| 5y6c |
0.54706 |
| 5guq |
0.54565 |
| 5gus |
0.54511 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 2 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
97.80 |
| TopL |
93.92 |
| Top2L |
77.07 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1745 |
| Neff |
451 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9813 |
| Model 3 |
0.8955 |
| Model 4 |
0.9812 |
| Model 5 |
0.9811 |
| Average |
0.95977 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 5y7d |
0.56500 |
| 5y6b |
0.54749 |
| 5y6c |
0.54718 |
| 5gus |
0.54631 |
| 5guq |
0.54400 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 3 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
97.80 |
| TopL |
94.48 |
| Top2L |
73.48 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1745 |
| Neff |
451 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.8932 |
| Model 2 |
0.8955 |
| Model 4 |
0.8942 |
| Model 5 |
0.8874 |
| Average |
0.89258 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 5y7d |
0.55937 |
| 5gus |
0.53756 |
| 5y6b |
0.53727 |
| 5y6c |
0.53690 |
| 5guq |
0.53449 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 4 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
96.70 |
| TopL |
92.27 |
| Top2L |
76.80 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1745 |
| Neff |
451 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9864 |
| Model 2 |
0.9812 |
| Model 3 |
0.8942 |
| Model 5 |
0.9892 |
| Average |
0.96275 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 5y7d |
0.56996 |
| 5y6b |
0.55169 |
| 5y6c |
0.55005 |
| 5gus |
0.54912 |
| 5guq |
0.54789 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 5 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
98.90 |
| TopL |
93.92 |
| Top2L |
77.07 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1745 |
| Neff |
451 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9836 |
| Model 2 |
0.9811 |
| Model 3 |
0.8874 |
| Model 4 |
0.9892 |
| Average |
0.96032 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 5y7d |
0.57302 |
| 5y6b |
0.54810 |
| 5y6c |
0.54569 |
| 5gus |
0.54499 |
| 5guq |
0.54433 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
References
[1] Hou, J., Wu, T., Cao, R., & Cheng, J. (2019). Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13. bioRxiv, 552422.
[2] Li, J., Deng, X., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2013). Designing and benchmarking the MULTICOM protein structure prediction system. BMC structural biology, 13(1), 2.
[3] Cheng, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Deng, X. (2012). The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics, 13(1), 65.
[4] Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2010). MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics, 26(7), 882-888.
