P76064
multicom
P76064
full_length
P76064
Results of Structure Prediction for Target Name: P76064 ( Click 
)
Domain Boundary prediction ( View )
>P76064: 1-140
| 1-60: |
M | K | I | K | H | E | H | I | E | S | V | L | F | A | L | A | A | E | K | G | Q | A | W | V | A | N | A | I | T | E | E | Y | L | R | Q | G | G | G | E | L | P | L | V | P | G | K | D | W | N | N | Q | Q | N | I | Y | H | R | W | L | K |
| 61-119: |
G | E | T | K | T | Q | R | E | K | I | Q | K | L | I | P | A | I | L | A | I | L | P | R | E | L | R | H | R | L | C | I | F | D | T | L | E | R | R | A | L | L | A | A | Q | E | A | L | S | T | A | I | D | A | H | D | D | A | V | Q | A |
| 121-140: |
V | Y | R | K | A | H | F | S | G | G | G | S | S | D | D | S | V | I | V | H |
| 1-60: |
C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C |
| 61-119: |
C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
| 121-140: |
H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | C |
| |
| | H(Helix): 101(72.14%) | E(Strand): 4(2.86%) | C(Coil): 35(25%) |
| 1-60: |
E | E | B | E | B | E | B | B | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | E |
| 61-119: |
E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | B | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | B | B |
| 121-140: |
B | B | E | E | B | E | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | E | E |
| |
| | e(Exposed): 64(45.71%) | b(Buried): 76(54.29%) |
| 1-60: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 61-119: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 121-140: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | T | T | T | T |
| |
| | N(Normal): 136(97.14%) | T(Disorder): 4(2.86%) |
Predicted contact map and distance map
|
Predicted distance map
|
|
Predicted contact map
|
Probability to Precision
| Long-Range |
Average probability |
Predicted precision |
| TopL/5 |
0.88 |
87.36 |
| TopL/2 |
0.62 |
66.03 |
Note: The linear model (Average probability vs Predicted precision) was trained on CASP14 dataset
|
Predicted Top 1 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
85.71 |
| TopL |
48.57 |
| Top2L |
25.71 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1005 |
| Neff |
124 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 2 |
0.8362 |
| Model 3 |
0.8782 |
| Model 4 |
0.9468 |
| Model 5 |
0.9016 |
| Average |
0.89070 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 3c4r |
0.56246 |
| 5kw2 |
0.52479 |
| 4zj8 |
0.52150 |
| 5ws3 |
0.51857 |
| 4c6g |
0.51773 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 2 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
81.43 |
| TopL |
45.71 |
| Top2L |
24.29 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1005 |
| Neff |
124 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.8362 |
| Model 3 |
0.8805 |
| Model 4 |
0.8468 |
| Model 5 |
0.8892 |
| Average |
0.86318 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 3c4r |
0.56260 |
| 4l79 |
0.55465 |
| 1ile |
0.53371 |
| 1jzq |
0.53045 |
| 4zt6 |
0.52619 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 3 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
82.86 |
| TopL |
47.14 |
| Top2L |
24.29 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1005 |
| Neff |
124 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.8782 |
| Model 2 |
0.8805 |
| Model 4 |
0.8593 |
| Model 5 |
0.8818 |
| Average |
0.87495 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 4l79 |
0.55698 |
| 3c4r |
0.55690 |
| 4pd3 |
0.53825 |
| 5ws3 |
0.53078 |
| 5wqc |
0.52853 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 4 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
82.86 |
| TopL |
46.43 |
| Top2L |
24.29 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1005 |
| Neff |
124 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9468 |
| Model 2 |
0.8468 |
| Model 3 |
0.8593 |
| Model 5 |
0.9083 |
| Average |
0.89030 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 3c4r |
0.56491 |
| 2eat |
0.53665 |
| 4ycl |
0.53172 |
| 5v7x |
0.52097 |
| 5wqc |
0.51800 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 5 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
81.43 |
| TopL |
46.43 |
| Top2L |
24.64 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
1005 |
| Neff |
124 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9016 |
| Model 2 |
0.8892 |
| Model 3 |
0.8818 |
| Model 4 |
0.9083 |
| Average |
0.89523 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 3c4r |
0.56110 |
| 5v7x |
0.53875 |
| 4s0v |
0.52833 |
| 5wqc |
0.52256 |
| 6tpj |
0.52252 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
References
[1] Hou, J., Wu, T., Cao, R., & Cheng, J. (2019). Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13. bioRxiv, 552422.
[2] Li, J., Deng, X., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2013). Designing and benchmarking the MULTICOM protein structure prediction system. BMC structural biology, 13(1), 2.
[3] Cheng, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Deng, X. (2012). The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics, 13(1), 65.
[4] Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2010). MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics, 26(7), 882-888.
