P76160
multicom
P76160
full_length
P76160
Results of Structure Prediction for Target Name: P76160 ( Click
)
Domain Boundary prediction ( View
)
>P76160: 1-103
1-60: |
M | T | Q | D | Y | E | L | V | V | K | G | V | R | N | F | E | N | K | V | T | V | T | V | A | L | Q | D | K | E | R | F | D | G | E | I | F | D | L | D | V | A | M | D | R | V | E | G | A | A | L | E | F | Y | E | A | A | A | R | R | S |
61-103: |
V | R | Q | V | F | L | E | V | A | E | K | L | S | E | K | V | E | S | Y | L | Q | H | Q | Y | S | F | K | I | E | N | P | A | N | K | H | E | R | P | H | H | K | Y | L |
1-60: |
C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | H | H | H | H | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
61-103: |
H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
|
| H(Helix): 29(28.16%) | E(Strand): 27(26.21%) | C(Coil): 47(45.63%) |
1-60: |
E | E | E | E | B | E | B | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | E |
61-103: |
B | E | E | B | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E |
|
| e(Exposed): 60(58.25%) | b(Buried): 43(41.75%) |
1-60: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
61-103: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T |
|
| N(Normal): 91(88.35%) | T(Disorder): 12(11.65%) |
Predicted contact map and distance map
Predicted distance map
|
|
Predicted contact map
|
Probability to Precision
Long-Range |
Average probability |
Predicted precision |
TopL/5 |
0.29 |
31.02 |
TopL/2 |
0.22 |
25.06 |
Note: The linear model (Average probability vs Predicted precision) was trained on CASP14 dataset
|
Predicted Top 1 Tertiary structure
|
|
Long-Range |
Precision |
TopL/5 |
85.71 |
TopL/2 |
53.85 |
TopL |
36.89 |
Top2L |
24.27 |
Alignment |
Number |
N |
330 |
Neff |
22 |
|
Model comparsion
Model |
TM-score |
Model 2 |
0.8807 |
Model 3 |
0.8864 |
Model 4 |
0.8308 |
Model 5 |
0.7158 |
Average |
0.82842 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
PDB |
TM-score |
4ilj |
0.61033 |
3e66 |
0.60831 |
6j6q |
0.60639 |
3sbg |
0.60618 |
4jke |
0.60584 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 2 Tertiary structure
|
|
Long-Range |
Precision |
TopL/5 |
76.19 |
TopL/2 |
53.85 |
TopL |
36.89 |
Top2L |
24.27 |
Alignment |
Number |
N |
330 |
Neff |
22 |
|
Model comparsion
Model |
TM-score |
Model 1 |
0.8807 |
Model 3 |
0.8633 |
Model 4 |
0.8509 |
Model 5 |
0.6965 |
Average |
0.82285 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
PDB |
TM-score |
4ilj |
0.63098 |
3e66 |
0.62997 |
3sbg |
0.62807 |
6exn |
0.62807 |
3sbt |
0.62750 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 3 Tertiary structure
|
|
Long-Range |
Precision |
TopL/5 |
80.95 |
TopL/2 |
53.85 |
TopL |
36.89 |
Top2L |
24.27 |
Alignment |
Number |
N |
330 |
Neff |
22 |
|
Model comparsion
Model |
TM-score |
Model 1 |
0.8864 |
Model 2 |
0.8633 |
Model 4 |
0.8168 |
Model 5 |
0.7052 |
Average |
0.81792 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
PDB |
TM-score |
6j6q |
0.62181 |
6exn |
0.62019 |
6j6g |
0.61974 |
6j6h |
0.61974 |
6j6n |
0.61974 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 4 Tertiary structure
|
|
Long-Range |
Precision |
TopL/5 |
85.71 |
TopL/2 |
55.77 |
TopL |
37.86 |
Top2L |
25.73 |
Alignment |
Number |
N |
330 |
Neff |
22 |
|
Model comparsion
Model |
TM-score |
Model 1 |
0.8308 |
Model 2 |
0.8509 |
Model 3 |
0.8168 |
Model 5 |
0.7009 |
Average |
0.79985 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
PDB |
TM-score |
4a5b |
0.64586 |
4kh4 |
0.64403 |
3agr |
0.64197 |
4a5a |
0.64192 |
4a57 |
0.64028 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 5 Tertiary structure
|
|
Long-Range |
Precision |
TopL/5 |
80.95 |
TopL/2 |
50.00 |
TopL |
34.95 |
Top2L |
22.33 |
Alignment |
Number |
N |
330 |
Neff |
22 |
|
Model comparsion
Model |
TM-score |
Model 1 |
0.7158 |
Model 2 |
0.6965 |
Model 3 |
0.7052 |
Model 4 |
0.7009 |
Average |
0.70460 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
PDB |
TM-score |
3bgh |
0.60339 |
5xda |
0.59114 |
4km8 |
0.58890 |
4kmh |
0.58873 |
5ejj |
0.58749 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
References
[1] Hou, J., Wu, T., Cao, R., & Cheng, J. (2019). Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13. bioRxiv, 552422.
[2] Li, J., Deng, X., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2013). Designing and benchmarking the MULTICOM protein structure prediction system. BMC structural biology, 13(1), 2.
[3] Cheng, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Deng, X. (2012). The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics, 13(1), 65.
[4] Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2010). MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics, 26(7), 882-888.