P96375
multicom
P96375
full_length
P96375
Results of Structure Prediction for Target Name: P96375 ( Click 
)
Domain Boundary prediction ( View )
>P96375: 1-155
| 1-60: |
M | V | T | R | Q | L | G | R | A | P | R | G | V | L | A | I | A | Y | R | C | P | N | G | E | P | G | V | V | K | T | A | P | R | L | P | D | G | T | P | F | P | T | L | Y | Y | L | T | H | P | V | L | T | A | A | A | S | R | L | E | T |
| 61-119: |
T | G | L | M | R | E | M | N | R | R | L | G | Q | D | A | E | L | A | A | A | Y | R | R | A | H | E | S | Y | L | S | E | R | D | A | L | E | P | L | G | T | T | V | S | A | G | G | M | P | D | R | V | K | C | L | H | V | L | I | A | H |
| 121-155: |
S | L | A | K | G | P | G | L | N | P | F | G | D | E | A | L | A | L | L | A | A | E | P | R | T | A | A | T | L | V | A | G | Q | W | R |
| 1-60: |
C | C | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
| 61-119: |
H | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
| 121-155: |
H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| |
| | H(Helix): 75(48.39%) | E(Strand): 15(9.68%) | C(Coil): 65(41.94%) |
| 1-60: |
E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E |
| 61-119: |
E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B |
| 121-155: |
B | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | B | E | B | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | E | E | B | E |
| |
| | e(Exposed): 75(48.39%) | b(Buried): 80(51.61%) |
| 1-60: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 61-119: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 121-155: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | T |
| |
| | N(Normal): 154(99.35%) | T(Disorder): 1(0.65%) |
Predicted contact map and distance map
|
Predicted distance map
|
|
Predicted contact map
|
Probability to Precision
| Long-Range |
Average probability |
Predicted precision |
| TopL/5 |
0.80 |
80.18 |
| TopL/2 |
0.64 |
67.61 |
Note: The linear model (Average probability vs Predicted precision) was trained on CASP14 dataset
|
Predicted Top 1 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
76.92 |
| TopL |
52.26 |
| Top2L |
32.26 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
3712 |
| Neff |
329 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 2 |
0.9800 |
| Model 3 |
0.9656 |
| Model 4 |
0.9640 |
| Model 5 |
0.9687 |
| Average |
0.96958 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 1i7q |
0.48459 |
| 6r3x |
0.48326 |
| 6r42 |
0.48320 |
| 4wej |
0.48267 |
| 3pbo |
0.48258 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 2 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
78.21 |
| TopL |
50.97 |
| Top2L |
31.94 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
3712 |
| Neff |
329 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9800 |
| Model 3 |
0.9686 |
| Model 4 |
0.9692 |
| Model 5 |
0.9609 |
| Average |
0.96967 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 1i7q |
0.48670 |
| 6r3x |
0.48370 |
| 6r42 |
0.48320 |
| 6hr9 |
0.48239 |
| 3pbo |
0.48180 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 3 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
79.49 |
| TopL |
52.90 |
| Top2L |
32.58 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
3712 |
| Neff |
329 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9656 |
| Model 2 |
0.9686 |
| Model 4 |
0.9611 |
| Model 5 |
0.9617 |
| Average |
0.96425 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 1i7q |
0.48528 |
| 6r3x |
0.48068 |
| 6hr4 |
0.48032 |
| 6hzr |
0.48032 |
| 3pbo |
0.47954 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 4 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
78.21 |
| TopL |
52.90 |
| Top2L |
33.55 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
3712 |
| Neff |
329 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9640 |
| Model 2 |
0.9692 |
| Model 3 |
0.9611 |
| Model 5 |
0.9459 |
| Average |
0.96005 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 4l0l |
0.48887 |
| 6r3x |
0.48863 |
| 6r42 |
0.48853 |
| 4oom |
0.48800 |
| 6r40 |
0.48792 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 5 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
79.49 |
| TopL |
52.90 |
| Top2L |
32.58 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
3712 |
| Neff |
329 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9687 |
| Model 2 |
0.9609 |
| Model 3 |
0.9617 |
| Model 4 |
0.9459 |
| Average |
0.95930 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 1i7q |
0.47974 |
| 5ocd |
0.47422 |
| 6r42 |
0.47383 |
| 4ool |
0.47300 |
| 3log |
0.47289 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
References
[1] Hou, J., Wu, T., Cao, R., & Cheng, J. (2019). Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13. bioRxiv, 552422.
[2] Li, J., Deng, X., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2013). Designing and benchmarking the MULTICOM protein structure prediction system. BMC structural biology, 13(1), 2.
[3] Cheng, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Deng, X. (2012). The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics, 13(1), 65.
[4] Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2010). MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics, 26(7), 882-888.
