P9WK52
multicom
P9WK52
full_length
P9WK52
Results of Structure Prediction for Target Name: P9WK52 ( Click 
)
Domain Boundary prediction ( View )
>P9WK52: 1-185
| 1-60: |
M | R | R | K | V | R | R | L | T | L | A | V | S | A | L | V | A | L | F | P | A | V | A | G | C | S | D | S | G | D | N | K | P | G | A | T | I | P | S | T | P | A | N | A | E | G | R | H | G | P | F | F | P | Q | C | G | G | V | S | D |
| 61-119: |
Q | T | V | T | E | L | T | R | V | T | G | L | V | N | T | A | K | N | S | V | G | C | Q | W | L | A | G | G | G | I | L | G | P | H | F | S | F | S | W | Y | R | G | S | P | I | G | R | E | R | K | T | E | E | L | S | R | A | S | V | E |
| 121-179: |
D | I | N | I | D | G | H | S | G | F | I | A | I | G | N | E | P | S | L | G | D | S | L | C | E | V | G | I | Q | F | S | D | D | F | I | E | W | S | V | S | F | S | Q | K | P | F | P | L | P | C | D | I | A | K | E | L | T | R | Q | S |
| 181-185: |
I | A | N | S | K |
| 1-60: |
C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H |
| 61-119: |
H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | E | E |
| 121-179: |
E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
| 181-185: |
H | H | H | C | C |
| |
| | H(Helix): 52(28.11%) | E(Strand): 42(22.7%) | C(Coil): 91(49.19%) |
| 1-60: |
E | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | B | E | E |
| 61-119: |
E | E | B | B | E | B | B | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | E |
| 121-179: |
E | B | E | B | E | E | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | B |
| 181-185: |
B | E | E | E | E |
| |
| | e(Exposed): 90(48.65%) | b(Buried): 95(51.35%) |
| 1-60: |
T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | N | N | T | T | T | T | N | N | N | N | N | N | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 61-119: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 121-179: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 181-185: |
N | N | N | N | T |
| |
| | N(Normal): 140(75.68%) | T(Disorder): 45(24.32%) |
Predicted contact map and distance map
|
Predicted distance map
|
|
Predicted contact map
|
Probability to Precision
| Long-Range |
Average probability |
Predicted precision |
| TopL/5 |
0.89 |
88.88 |
| TopL/2 |
0.74 |
77.97 |
Note: The linear model (Average probability vs Predicted precision) was trained on CASP14 dataset
|
Predicted Top 1 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
97.30 |
| TopL/2 |
88.17 |
| TopL |
61.62 |
| Top2L |
33.24 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
6481 |
| Neff |
2437 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 2 |
0.7814 |
| Model 3 |
0.8157 |
| Model 4 |
0.7939 |
| Model 5 |
0.7763 |
| Average |
0.79183 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 3lyd |
0.55335 |
| 4esq |
0.54714 |
| 6mna |
0.53692 |
| 6e5f |
0.53684 |
| 6e5d |
0.53643 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 2 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
84.95 |
| TopL |
59.46 |
| Top2L |
32.43 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
6481 |
| Neff |
2437 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.7814 |
| Model 3 |
0.8101 |
| Model 4 |
0.8308 |
| Model 5 |
0.7935 |
| Average |
0.80395 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 6e5d |
0.56053 |
| 6mna |
0.55882 |
| 6e5f |
0.55820 |
| 4esq |
0.54214 |
| 3lyd |
0.54141 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 3 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
88.17 |
| TopL |
62.16 |
| Top2L |
33.51 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
6481 |
| Neff |
2437 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.8157 |
| Model 2 |
0.8101 |
| Model 4 |
0.8713 |
| Model 5 |
0.7844 |
| Average |
0.82037 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 6e5f |
0.56137 |
| 6mna |
0.56118 |
| 6e5d |
0.55909 |
| 4esq |
0.54422 |
| 3lyd |
0.53781 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 4 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
83.87 |
| TopL |
57.84 |
| Top2L |
31.08 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
6481 |
| Neff |
2437 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.7939 |
| Model 2 |
0.8308 |
| Model 3 |
0.8713 |
| Model 5 |
0.7851 |
| Average |
0.82027 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 6mna |
0.55897 |
| 6e5f |
0.55659 |
| 6e5d |
0.55581 |
| 4esq |
0.54592 |
| 4ol4 |
0.54006 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 5 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
88.17 |
| TopL |
61.08 |
| Top2L |
32.97 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
6481 |
| Neff |
2437 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.7763 |
| Model 2 |
0.7935 |
| Model 3 |
0.7844 |
| Model 4 |
0.7851 |
| Average |
0.78482 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 6e5d |
0.57445 |
| 6e5f |
0.57214 |
| 6mna |
0.57157 |
| 3lyd |
0.54522 |
| 4esq |
0.54366 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
References
[1] Hou, J., Wu, T., Cao, R., & Cheng, J. (2019). Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13. bioRxiv, 552422.
[2] Li, J., Deng, X., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2013). Designing and benchmarking the MULTICOM protein structure prediction system. BMC structural biology, 13(1), 2.
[3] Cheng, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Deng, X. (2012). The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics, 13(1), 65.
[4] Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2010). MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics, 26(7), 882-888.
