Q6FDU1
multicom
Q6FDU1
full_length
Q6FDU1
Results of Structure Prediction for Target Name: Q6FDU1 ( Click 
)
Domain Boundary prediction ( View )
>Q6FDU1: 1-186
| 1-60: |
M | S | A | N | T | F | P | A | Q | I | E | P | Y | K | W | A | E | Q | G | F | T | W | S | G | T | L | P | L | S | R | F | A | R | I | A | R | E | A | V | G | S | I | N | D | Q | L | I | Y | I | D | C | K | L | S | M | D | A | Y | H | R |
| 61-119: |
I | V | W | F | E | G | H | I | E | T | K | V | P | L | E | C | Q | R | C | L | E | P | V | E | I | P | L | V | S | D | F | R | L | A | L | V | D | D | E | S | L | I | E | R | L | D | E | D | A | D | F | I | V | L | G | E | S | E | S | S |
| 121-179: |
T | K | G | D | F | A | T | P | A | T | V | D | L | L | S | L | L | E | D | E | L | L | L | L | M | P | L | S | P | K | H | D | A | C | E | H | K | H | Q | P | T | V | Q | D | I | V | E | E | K | R | D | N | P | F | D | V | L | A | S | L |
| 181-186: |
K | G | K | L | N | S |
| 1-60: |
C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 61-119: |
E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 121-179: |
C | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
| 181-186: |
H | H | H | C | C | C |
|
| | H(Helix): 58(31.18%) | E(Strand): 41(22.04%) | C(Coil): 87(46.77%) |
| 1-60: |
E | E | E | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | B | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | B | E | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | E |
| 61-119: |
B | B | B | B | E | B | E | B | E | B | E | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | B | E | B | E | B | E | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | E |
| 121-179: |
E | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | E | B | B | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | B |
| 181-186: |
E | E | E | E | E | E |
|
| | e(Exposed): 109(58.6%) | b(Buried): 77(41.4%) |
| 1-60: |
T | T | T | T | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 61-119: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 121-179: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | T | N | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 181-186: |
N | T | T | T | T | T |
|
| | N(Normal): 164(88.17%) | T(Disorder): 22(11.83%) |
Predicted contact map and distance map
|
Predicted distance map
|
|
Predicted contact map
|
Probability to Precision
| Long-Range |
Average probability |
Predicted precision |
| TopL/5 |
0.96 |
95.38 |
| TopL/2 |
0.86 |
89.73 |
Note: The linear model (Average probability vs Predicted precision) was trained on CASP14 dataset
|
Predicted Top 1 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
97.30 |
| TopL/2 |
92.47 |
| TopL |
75.27 |
| Top2L |
44.09 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
6762 |
| Neff |
2708 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 2 |
0.9309 |
| Model 3 |
0.8867 |
| Model 4 |
0.7748 |
| Model 5 |
0.7737 |
| Average |
0.84153 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 3kvn |
0.50123 |
| 6h3i |
0.49448 |
| 6afw |
0.49152 |
| 4k3c |
0.49107 |
| 6afx |
0.48958 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 2 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
97.30 |
| TopL/2 |
94.62 |
| TopL |
74.73 |
| Top2L |
43.82 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
6762 |
| Neff |
2708 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9309 |
| Model 3 |
0.8840 |
| Model 4 |
0.7713 |
| Model 5 |
0.7729 |
| Average |
0.83977 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 5or1 |
0.49360 |
| 5d0o |
0.49293 |
| 6fsu |
0.49179 |
| 5ayw |
0.49169 |
| 4n75 |
0.49166 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 3 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
97.30 |
| TopL/2 |
95.70 |
| TopL |
74.19 |
| Top2L |
42.74 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
6762 |
| Neff |
2708 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.8867 |
| Model 2 |
0.8840 |
| Model 4 |
0.7728 |
| Model 5 |
0.7819 |
| Average |
0.83135 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 5or1 |
0.49702 |
| 5d0o |
0.49608 |
| 6fsu |
0.49482 |
| 6t1w |
0.49432 |
| 6qgw |
0.49019 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 4 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
94.59 |
| TopL/2 |
93.55 |
| TopL |
68.82 |
| Top2L |
35.75 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
6762 |
| Neff |
2708 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.7748 |
| Model 2 |
0.7713 |
| Model 3 |
0.7728 |
| Model 5 |
0.8770 |
| Average |
0.79897 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 3fhh |
0.48780 |
| 3slo |
0.48572 |
| 3slj |
0.48544 |
| 3slt |
0.48458 |
| 3dwo |
0.47912 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 5 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
97.30 |
| TopL/2 |
92.47 |
| TopL |
66.67 |
| Top2L |
35.75 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
6762 |
| Neff |
2708 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.7737 |
| Model 2 |
0.7729 |
| Model 3 |
0.7819 |
| Model 4 |
0.8770 |
| Average |
0.80137 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 4b7o |
0.47957 |
| 4aip |
0.47927 |
| 6h3i |
0.47686 |
| 3dwo |
0.47552 |
| 3slo |
0.47388 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
References
[1] Hou, J., Wu, T., Cao, R., & Cheng, J. (2019). Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13. bioRxiv, 552422.
[2] Li, J., Deng, X., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2013). Designing and benchmarking the MULTICOM protein structure prediction system. BMC structural biology, 13(1), 2.
[3] Cheng, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Deng, X. (2012). The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics, 13(1), 65.
[4] Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2010). MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics, 26(7), 882-888.
