Q8A5F7
multicom
Q8A5F7
full_length
Q8A5F7
Results of Structure Prediction for Target Name: Q8A5F7 ( Click 
)
Domain Boundary prediction ( View )
>Q8A5F7: 1-190
| 1-60: |
M | G | L | S | G | F | H | S | F | L | C | C | R | S | R | D | Y | H | L | V | I | N | T | L | I | H | T | V | M | T | M | D | I | T | K | S | V | A | F | T | G | H | R | S | E | R | I | L | Q | V | R | M | L | Y | L | Y | L | D | I | V |
| 61-119: |
S | Q | V | K | R | L | Y | S | L | G | Y | R | Y | F | L | S | G | M | A | E | G | F | D | L | L | A | A | Q | A | V | T | A | L | K | A | E | Y | T | D | I | R | L | I | A | V | V | P | F | S | R | Q | S | N | R | Y | R | P | E | N | K |
| 121-179: |
S | L | Y | D | R | I | M | K | T | A | D | E | T | V | I | L | R | E | D | Y | R | K | G | C | F | H | H | R | N | D | Y | L | I | D | N | S | E | I | V | L | A | Y | W | D | K | Q | P | Y | G | G | T | Y | Y | T | V | G | K | A | R | M |
| 181-190: |
V | N | R | I | I | I | N | L | Y | K |
| 1-60: |
C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | C | C | C | C | C | H | E | E | E | E | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
| 61-119: |
H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | C | H | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H |
| 121-179: |
H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | E | H | H | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
| 181-190: |
C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | C | C |
| |
| | H(Helix): 73(38.42%) | E(Strand): 36(18.95%) | C(Coil): 81(42.63%) |
| 1-60: |
E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | B | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E |
| 61-119: |
E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | E | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | E |
| 121-179: |
E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | B | E | B | B | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | B | B | E | B | B | E | E |
| 181-190: |
E | E | B | E | B | B | E | B | B | E |
| |
| | e(Exposed): 73(38.42%) | b(Buried): 117(61.58%) |
| 1-60: |
T | T | T | T | T | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 61-119: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 121-179: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 181-190: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| |
| | N(Normal): 185(97.37%) | T(Disorder): 5(2.63%) |
Predicted contact map and distance map
|
Predicted distance map
|
|
Predicted contact map
|
Probability to Precision
| Long-Range |
Average probability |
Predicted precision |
| TopL/5 |
0.98 |
97.10 |
| TopL/2 |
0.94 |
98.01 |
Note: The linear model (Average probability vs Predicted precision) was trained on CASP14 dataset
|
Predicted Top 1 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
97.37 |
| TopL/2 |
94.74 |
| TopL |
95.26 |
| Top2L |
66.32 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
16891 |
| Neff |
2413 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 2 |
0.9207 |
| Model 3 |
0.9198 |
| Model 4 |
0.9254 |
| Model 5 |
0.9276 |
| Average |
0.92338 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 2nx2 |
0.72554 |
| 3uqz |
0.71729 |
| 3maj |
0.71108 |
| 6drj |
0.68642 |
| 6pus |
0.68444 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 2 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
97.37 |
| TopL/2 |
96.84 |
| TopL |
95.26 |
| Top2L |
65.00 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
16891 |
| Neff |
2413 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9207 |
| Model 3 |
0.9271 |
| Model 4 |
0.9136 |
| Model 5 |
0.9226 |
| Average |
0.92100 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 2nx2 |
0.72177 |
| 6puu |
0.69477 |
| 6pus |
0.69203 |
| 6pur |
0.69202 |
| 6drj |
0.69018 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 3 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
97.37 |
| TopL/2 |
95.79 |
| TopL |
95.26 |
| Top2L |
65.79 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
16891 |
| Neff |
2413 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9198 |
| Model 2 |
0.9271 |
| Model 4 |
0.9473 |
| Model 5 |
0.9154 |
| Average |
0.92740 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 2nx2 |
0.72926 |
| 3maj |
0.69975 |
| 3uqz |
0.69267 |
| 6puu |
0.68171 |
| 6drj |
0.68002 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 4 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
97.37 |
| TopL/2 |
94.74 |
| TopL |
94.74 |
| Top2L |
64.74 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
16891 |
| Neff |
2413 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9254 |
| Model 2 |
0.9136 |
| Model 3 |
0.9473 |
| Model 5 |
0.9209 |
| Average |
0.92680 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 2nx2 |
0.72798 |
| 3maj |
0.70546 |
| 3uqz |
0.70359 |
| 6drj |
0.67825 |
| 6puu |
0.67612 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 5 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
97.37 |
| TopL/2 |
95.79 |
| TopL |
94.74 |
| Top2L |
65.53 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
16891 |
| Neff |
2413 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.9276 |
| Model 2 |
0.9226 |
| Model 3 |
0.9154 |
| Model 4 |
0.9209 |
| Average |
0.92163 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 2nx2 |
0.72555 |
| 3maj |
0.71575 |
| 3uqz |
0.70135 |
| 6puu |
0.68779 |
| 6drj |
0.68452 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
References
[1] Hou, J., Wu, T., Cao, R., & Cheng, J. (2019). Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13. bioRxiv, 552422.
[2] Li, J., Deng, X., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2013). Designing and benchmarking the MULTICOM protein structure prediction system. BMC structural biology, 13(1), 2.
[3] Cheng, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Deng, X. (2012). The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics, 13(1), 65.
[4] Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2010). MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics, 26(7), 882-888.
