Q9KKS9
multicom
Q9KKS9
full_length
Q9KKS9
Results of Structure Prediction for Target Name: Q9KKS9 ( Click
)
Domain Boundary prediction ( View
)
>Q9KKS9: 1-119
1-60: |
M | S | E | T | A | F | R | Q | G | K | K | R | F | F | D | T | K | K | F | P | R | G | F | A | K | S | G | D | F | T | L | A | E | E | D | I | L | T | R | Y | G | D | T | M | L | G | L | E | S | G | E | L | Q | P | E | N | A | D | E | E |
61-119: |
H | F | L | K | V | L | A | N | P | E | L | A | E | N | K | L | E | K | A | W | L | K | Y | T | R | L | A | R | G | R | K | R | F | H | T | L | N | G | R | N | K | P | D | G | V | E | D | Y | T | D | D | E | P | S | L | T | E | E | D |
1-60: |
C | C | C | C | H | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H |
61-119: |
H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
|
| H(Helix): 42(35.29%) | E(Strand): 9(7.56%) | C(Coil): 68(57.14%) |
1-60: |
E | E | E | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | B | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | B | E | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | B | E |
61-119: |
E | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | B | E | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | E | E | E |
|
| e(Exposed): 75(63.03%) | b(Buried): 44(36.97%) |
1-60: |
T | T | T | T | N | N | T | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
61-119: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T |
|
| N(Normal): 93(78.15%) | T(Disorder): 26(21.85%) |
Predicted contact map and distance map
Predicted distance map
|
|
Predicted contact map
|
Probability to Precision
Long-Range |
Average probability |
Predicted precision |
TopL/5 |
0.72 |
72.66 |
TopL/2 |
0.44 |
47.12 |
Note: The linear model (Average probability vs Predicted precision) was trained on CASP14 dataset
|
Predicted Top 1 Tertiary structure
|
|
Long-Range |
Precision |
TopL/5 |
91.67 |
TopL/2 |
55.00 |
TopL |
31.93 |
Top2L |
18.07 |
Alignment |
Number |
N |
967 |
Neff |
172 |
|
Model comparsion
Model |
TM-score |
Model 2 |
0.8655 |
Model 3 |
0.7779 |
Model 4 |
0.6517 |
Model 5 |
0.8141 |
Average |
0.77730 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
PDB |
TM-score |
6b7q |
0.51588 |
6g0c |
0.51440 |
1v7x |
0.51127 |
1v7v |
0.51090 |
1v7w |
0.51020 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 2 Tertiary structure
|
|
Long-Range |
Precision |
TopL/5 |
91.67 |
TopL/2 |
60.00 |
TopL |
36.13 |
Top2L |
21.01 |
Alignment |
Number |
N |
967 |
Neff |
172 |
|
Model comparsion
Model |
TM-score |
Model 1 |
0.8655 |
Model 3 |
0.7784 |
Model 4 |
0.6460 |
Model 5 |
0.8030 |
Average |
0.77322 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
PDB |
TM-score |
6b7q |
0.51819 |
6g0c |
0.51626 |
6b7o |
0.50654 |
6b7p |
0.50557 |
6p25 |
0.50070 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 3 Tertiary structure
|
|
Long-Range |
Precision |
TopL/5 |
91.67 |
TopL/2 |
60.00 |
TopL |
36.13 |
Top2L |
21.01 |
Alignment |
Number |
N |
967 |
Neff |
172 |
|
Model comparsion
Model |
TM-score |
Model 1 |
0.7779 |
Model 2 |
0.7784 |
Model 4 |
0.6466 |
Model 5 |
0.8273 |
Average |
0.75755 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
PDB |
TM-score |
6g0c |
0.53746 |
6b7q |
0.53643 |
6tz1 |
0.51962 |
3jb7 |
0.51246 |
6p2r |
0.51001 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 4 Tertiary structure
|
|
Long-Range |
Precision |
TopL/5 |
95.83 |
TopL/2 |
55.00 |
TopL |
28.57 |
Top2L |
14.29 |
Alignment |
Number |
N |
967 |
Neff |
172 |
|
Model comparsion
Model |
TM-score |
Model 1 |
0.6517 |
Model 2 |
0.6460 |
Model 3 |
0.6466 |
Model 5 |
0.6541 |
Average |
0.64960 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
PDB |
TM-score |
3wqy |
0.52201 |
2ztg |
0.51313 |
5zap |
0.50499 |
3wqz |
0.50146 |
3jb7 |
0.50041 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 5 Tertiary structure
|
|
Long-Range |
Precision |
TopL/5 |
91.67 |
TopL/2 |
56.67 |
TopL |
33.61 |
Top2L |
19.75 |
Alignment |
Number |
N |
967 |
Neff |
172 |
|
Model comparsion
Model |
TM-score |
Model 1 |
0.8141 |
Model 2 |
0.8030 |
Model 3 |
0.8273 |
Model 4 |
0.6541 |
Average |
0.77463 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
PDB |
TM-score |
6b7q |
0.53941 |
6p2r |
0.51706 |
5zq2 |
0.51503 |
6gh3 |
0.50928 |
5h42 |
0.50259 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
References
[1] Hou, J., Wu, T., Cao, R., & Cheng, J. (2019). Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13. bioRxiv, 552422.
[2] Li, J., Deng, X., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2013). Designing and benchmarking the MULTICOM protein structure prediction system. BMC structural biology, 13(1), 2.
[3] Cheng, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Deng, X. (2012). The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics, 13(1), 65.
[4] Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2010). MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics, 26(7), 882-888.