Q9KRB8
multicom
Q9KRB8
full_length
Q9KRB8
Results of Structure Prediction for Target Name: Q9KRB8 ( Click 
)
Domain Boundary prediction ( View )
>Q9KRB8: 1-103
| 1-60: |
M | K | I | Y | T | A | T | H | P | L | E | A | H | M | L | M | Q | L | L | H | Q | Q | G | I | A | C | E | L | R | G | E | M | L | F | A | L | R | G | E | I | P | M | D | S | S | S | A | P | S | L | W | L | Q | K | P | E | Q | Q | T | A |
| 61-103: |
A | Q | Q | I | I | R | E | F | L | N | P | P | P | A | E | C | W | Q | C | P | E | C | G | E | H | H | E | G | Q | F | S | A | C | W | Q | C | G | F | S | Q | T | T | Q |
| 1-60: |
C | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | C | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | C | H | H | H | H | H | H |
| 61-103: |
H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| |
| | H(Helix): 34(33.01%) | E(Strand): 20(19.42%) | C(Coil): 49(47.57%) |
| 1-60: |
E | E | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | B | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | B | E | B | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | E | B | B | E | E |
| 61-103: |
B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | E | B | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | E |
| |
| | e(Exposed): 56(54.37%) | b(Buried): 47(45.63%) |
| 1-60: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 61-103: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | T | T | T | T |
| |
| | N(Normal): 99(96.12%) | T(Disorder): 4(3.88%) |
Predicted contact map and distance map
|
Predicted distance map
|
|
Predicted contact map
|
Probability to Precision
| Long-Range |
Average probability |
Predicted precision |
| TopL/5 |
0.96 |
95.01 |
| TopL/2 |
0.88 |
91.92 |
Note: The linear model (Average probability vs Predicted precision) was trained on CASP14 dataset
|
Predicted Top 1 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
98.08 |
| TopL |
59.22 |
| Top2L |
29.61 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
8911 |
| Neff |
1888 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 2 |
0.7738 |
| Model 3 |
0.8450 |
| Model 4 |
0.6933 |
| Model 5 |
0.7180 |
| Average |
0.75753 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 5tcp |
0.57746 |
| 6pem |
0.57180 |
| 6q14 |
0.57180 |
| 6q16 |
0.56948 |
| 1yj7 |
0.56324 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 2 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
96.15 |
| TopL |
58.25 |
| Top2L |
30.10 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
8911 |
| Neff |
1888 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.7738 |
| Model 3 |
0.7271 |
| Model 4 |
0.6825 |
| Model 5 |
0.7242 |
| Average |
0.72690 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 1yj7 |
0.59742 |
| 5wq9 |
0.58844 |
| 5wq8 |
0.58844 |
| 6i1x |
0.58802 |
| 5wq7 |
0.58761 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 3 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
98.08 |
| TopL |
59.22 |
| Top2L |
30.58 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
8911 |
| Neff |
1888 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.8450 |
| Model 2 |
0.7271 |
| Model 4 |
0.7111 |
| Model 5 |
0.6867 |
| Average |
0.74247 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 5tcp |
0.57861 |
| 6pem |
0.57117 |
| 6q14 |
0.57117 |
| 6q16 |
0.56808 |
| 3ujn |
0.56583 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 4 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
98.08 |
| TopL |
60.19 |
| Top2L |
30.58 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
8911 |
| Neff |
1888 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.6933 |
| Model 2 |
0.6825 |
| Model 3 |
0.7111 |
| Model 5 |
0.7214 |
| Average |
0.70208 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 6nl1 |
0.59332 |
| 6p5r |
0.58890 |
| 6u9x |
0.58400 |
| 5tcp |
0.56962 |
| 1yj7 |
0.56854 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 5 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
100.00 |
| TopL/2 |
98.08 |
| TopL |
62.14 |
| Top2L |
31.55 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
8911 |
| Neff |
1888 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.7180 |
| Model 2 |
0.7242 |
| Model 3 |
0.6867 |
| Model 4 |
0.7214 |
| Average |
0.71257 |
Radius Gyration
|
Similar pdbs
| PDB |
TM-score |
| 5tcp |
0.61959 |
| 6pem |
0.61461 |
| 6q14 |
0.61461 |
| 6q16 |
0.61381 |
| 1yj7 |
0.60709 |
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
References
[1] Hou, J., Wu, T., Cao, R., & Cheng, J. (2019). Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13. bioRxiv, 552422.
[2] Li, J., Deng, X., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2013). Designing and benchmarking the MULTICOM protein structure prediction system. BMC structural biology, 13(1), 2.
[3] Cheng, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Deng, X. (2012). The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics, 13(1), 65.
[4] Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2010). MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics, 26(7), 882-888.
